INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATION 1 (ASSESSING ML/TF RISKS AND APPLYING A RISK-BASED APPROACH) |
Lower risk Countries may decide to allow simplified measures for some of the FATF Recommendations requiring financial institutions or DNFBPs to take certain actions, provided that a lower risk has been identified, and this is consistent with the country’s assessment of its money laundering and terrorist financing risks, as referred to in paragraph 3.
Independent of any decision to specify certain lower risk categories in line with the previous paragraph, countries may also allow financial institutions and DNFBPs to apply simplified customer due diligence (CDD) measures, provided that the requirements set out in section B below (“Obligations and decisions for financial institutions and DNFBPs”), and in paragraph 7 below, are met.
While the information gathered may vary according to the level of risk, the requirements of Recommendation 11 to retain information should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. apply to whatever information is gathered.
INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATION 2 (NATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION) |
INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATION 3 (MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENCE) |
INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATIONS 22 AND 23 (DNFBPS) |
Financial transactions above a designated threshold include situations where the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.
INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATIONS 22 AND 23 (DNFBPS) |
Financial transactions above a designated threshold include situations where the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.
INTERPRETIVE NOTE TO RECOMMENDATION 24 (TRANSPARENCY AND BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF LEGAL PERSONS) |
Countries should have mechanisms that ensure that basic information and beneficial ownership information, including information provided to the company registry and any available information referred to in paragraph 7, is adequate, accurate and up to date.
Adequate information is information that is sufficient to identify*Examples of information aimed at identifying the natural person(s) who are the beneficial owner(s) include the full name, nationality(ies), the full date and place of birth, residential address, national identification number and document type, and the tax identification number or equivalent in the country of residence. the natural person(s) who are the beneficial owner(s), and the means and mechanisms through which they exercise beneficial ownership or control.
Accurate information is information, which has been verified to confirm its accuracy by verifying the identity and status of the beneficial owner using reliable, independently sourced/obtained documents, data or information. The extent of verification measures may vary according to the specific level of risk.
Countries should consider complementary measures as necessary to support the accuracy of beneficial ownership information, e.g. discrepancy reporting.
Up-to-date information is information which is as current and up-to-date as possible, and is updated within a reasonable period (e.g. within one month) following any change.