A. AML/CFT POLICIES AND COORDINATION1. Assessing risks and applying a risk-based approach * |
CountriesAll references in the FATF Recommendations to country or countries apply equally to territories or jurisdictions. should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. identify, assess, and understand the money laundering and terrorist financing Terrorist financing is the financing of terrorist acts, and of terrorists and terrorist organisations. risks All references to risk refer to the risk of money laundering and/or terrorist financing. This term should be read in conjunction with the Interpretive Note to Recommendation 1. for the country, and should take action, including designating an authority or mechanism to coordinate actions to assess risks, and apply resources, aimed at ensuring the risks are mitigated effectively. Based on that assessment, countries should apply a risk-based approach (RBA) to ensure that measures to prevent or mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing are commensurate with the risks identified. This approach should be an essential foundation to efficient allocation of resources across the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime and the implementation of riskbased measures throughout the FATF Recommendations. Where countries identify higher risks, they should ensure that their AML/CFT regime adequately addresses such risks. Where countries identify lower risks, they may decide to allow simplified measures for some of the FATF Recommendations under certain conditions.
Countries should also identify, assess, and understand the proliferation financing risks for the country. In the context of Recommendation 1, «proliferation financing risk» refers strictly and only to the potential breach, non-implementation or evasion of the targeted financial sanctions obligations referred to in Recommendation 7. Countries should take commensurate action aimed at ensuring that these risks are mitigated effectively, including designating an authority or mechanism to coordinate actions to assess risks, and allocate resources efficiently for this purpose. Where countries identify higher risks, they should ensure that they adequately address such risks. Where countries identify lower risks, they should ensure that the measures applied are commensurate with the level of proliferation financing risk, while still ensuring full implementation of the targeted financial sanctions as required in Recommendation 7.
Countries should require financial institutions Financial institutions means any natural or legal person who conducts as abusiness one or more of the following activities or operations for or on behalf of a customer:
1) Acceptance of deposits and other repayable funds from the public.
2) Lending.
3) Financial leasing.
4) Money or value transfer services.
5) Issuing and managing means of payment (e.g. credit and debit cards,cheques, traveller's cheques, money orders and bankers' drafts, electronic money).
6) Financial guarantees and commitments.
7) Trading in:
a) money market instruments (cheques, bills, certificates of deposit, derivatives etc.);
b) foreign exchange;
c) exchange, interest rate and index instruments;
d) transferable securities;
8) Participation in securities issues and the provision of financial services related to such issues.
9) Individual and collective portfolio management.
11) Otherwise investing, administering or managing funds or money on behalf of other persons.
12) Underwriting and placement of life insurance and other investment related insurance.
13) Money and currency changing.
and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) to identify, assess and take effective action to mitigate their money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing risks.
A. AML/CFT POLICIES AND COORDINATION2. National cooperation and coordination* |
Countries should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. have national AML/CFT/CPF policies, informed by the risksProliferation financing risk refers strictly and only to the potential breach, non-implementation or evasion of the targeted financial sanctions obligations referred to in Recommendation 7. identified, which should be regularly reviewed, and should designate an authority or have a coordination or other mechanism that is responsible for such policies.
Countries should ensure that policy-makers, the financial intelligence unit (FIU), law enforcement authorities, supervisors and other relevant competent authorities, at the policymaking and operational levels, have effective mechanisms in place which enable them to cooperate, and, where appropriate, coordinate and exchange information domestically with each other concerning the development and implementation of policies and activities to combat money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. This should include cooperation and coordination between relevant authorities to ensure the compatibility of AML/CFT/CPF requirements with Data Protection and Privacy rules and other similar provisions (e. g. data security/localization).
B. MONEY LAUNDERING AND CONFISCATIONThe term confiscation, which includes forfeiture where applicable, means the permanent deprivation of the funds or other assetsThe term funds or other assets means any assets, including, but not limited to, financial assets, economic resources, property of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form, including electronic or digital, evidencing title to, or interest in, such funds or other assets, including, but not limited to, bank credits, travellers cheques, bank cheques, money orders, shares, securities, bonds, drafts, or letters of credit, and any interest, dividends or other income on or value accruing from or generated by such funds or other assets. by order of a competent authority or a court. Confiscation or forfeiture takes place through a judicial or administrative procedure that transfers the ownership of specified funds or other assets to be transferred to the State. In this case, the person(s) or entity(ies) that held an interest in the specified funds or other assets at the time of the confiscation or forfeiture loses all rights, in principle, to the confiscated or forfeited funds or other assets. Confiscation or forfeiture orders are usually linked to a criminal conviction or a court decision whereby the confiscated or forfeited property is determined to have been derived from or intended for use in a violation of the law.3. Money laundering offence* |
Countries should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. criminalise money laundering on the basis of the Vienna Convention and the Palermo Convention. Countries should apply the crime of money laundering to all serious offences, with a view to including the widest range of predicate offences.
C. TERRORIST FINANCING AND FINANCING OF PROLIFERATION8. Non-profit organisations refers to a legal person or arrangement or organisation that primarily engages in raising or disbursing funds for purposes such as charitable, religious, cultural, educational, social or fraternal purposes, or for the carrying out of other types of "good works". * |
Countries should review the adequacy of laws and regulations that relate to non-profit organizations which the country has identified as being vulnerable to terrorist financing abuse. Countries should apply focused and proportionate measures, in line with the risk-based approach, to such non-profit organizations to protect them from terrorist financing abuse, including:
D. PREVENTIVE MEASURES9. Financial institution secrecy laws* |
Countries should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. ensure that financial institution secrecy laws do not inhibit implementation of the FATF Recommendations.
D. PREVENTIVE MEASURESCUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE AND RECORD-KEEPING10. Customer due diligence* |
Financial institutions Financial institutions means any natural or legal person who conducts as abusiness one or more of the following activities or operations for or on behalf of a customer:
1) Acceptance of deposits and other repayable funds from the public.
2) Lending.
3) Financial leasing.
4) Money or value transfer services.
5) Issuing and managing means of payment (e.g. credit and debit cards,cheques, traveller's cheques, money orders and bankers' drafts, electronic money).
6) Financial guarantees and commitments.
7) Trading in:
a) money market instruments (cheques, bills, certificates of deposit, derivatives etc.);
b) foreign exchange;
c) exchange, interest rate and index instruments;
d) transferable securities;
8) Participation in securities issues and the provision of financial services related to such issues.
9) Individual and collective portfolio management.
11) Otherwise investing, administering or managing funds or money on behalf of other persons.
12) Underwriting and placement of life insurance and other investment related insurance.
13) Money and currency changing.
should For the purposes of assessing compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the word should has the same meaning as must. be prohibited from keeping anonymous accountsReferences to “accounts” should be read as including other similar business relationships between financial institutions and their customers. or accountsReferences to “accounts” should be read as including other similar business relationships between financial institutions and their customers. in obviously fictitious names.
Financial institutions should be required to undertake customer due diligence (CDD) measures when:
The principle that financial institutions should conduct CDD should be set out in law. Each countryAll references in the FATF Recommendations to country or countries apply equally to territories or jurisdictions. may determine how it imposes specific CDD obligations, either through law or enforceable means Please refer to the Note on the Legal Basis of requirements on Financial Institutions and DNFBPs..
The CDD measures to be taken are as follows:
Financial institutions should be required to apply each of the CDD measures under (a) to (d) above, but should determine the extent of such measures using a risk-based approach (RBA) in accordance with the Interpretive Notes to this Recommendation and to Recommendation 1.
Financial institutions should be required to verify the identity of the customer and beneficial ownerBeneficial owner refers to the natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls a customer and/or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or arrangement. before or during the course of establishing a business relationship or conducting transactions for occasional customers. Countries may permit financial institutions to complete the verification as soon as reasonably practicable following the establishment of the relationship, where the money laundering and terrorist financing risks are effectively managed and where this is essential not to interrupt the normal conduct of business.
Where the financial institution is unable to comply with the applicable requirements under paragraphs (a) to (d) above (subject to appropriate modification of the extent of the measures on a risk-based approach), it should be required not to open the account, commence business relations or perform the transaction; or should be required to terminate the business relationship; and should consider making a suspicious transactions report in relation to the customer.
These requirements should apply to all new customers, although financial institutions should also apply this Recommendation to existing customers on the basis of materiality and risk All references to risk refer to the risk of money laundering and/or terrorist financing. This term should be read in conjunction with the Interpretive Note to Recommendation 1., and should conduct due diligence on such existing relationships at appropriate times.